soil, provided services certified by the Department of Homeland Security were deployed.Īt the time, Eglet criticized MGM, calling the company lawsuits “outrageous” accusing the company of using the legal maneuver to “judge shop.” It protects corporations in the event of mass attacks committed on U.S. In its civil actions, MGM claimed it did not have to pay damages to shooting victims because the company was protected by 2002 legislation, the Support Anti-Terrorism by Fostering Effective Technologies, or Safety Act. In July 2018, MGM filed federal lawsuits against more than 1,000 victims in a legal maneuver aimed at avoiding liability. It is our sincere hope that this agreement means that scenario will be avoided.”Įglet stressed Thursday that the settlement was not an admission of liability by MGM, in a stark reversal from his harsh words about the company last summer. “We have always believed that prolonged litigation around these matters is in no one’s best interest. "Our goal has always been to resolve these matters so our community and the victims and their families can move forward in the healing process,” MGM Resorts Chairman and CEO Jim Murren said in a statement.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |